remote utilities viewer remote video surveillance

It's not your problem/fault that someone else is hacking your application. All other variants should be considered as unsafe. They should only be whitelisting the legitimate version's signature. The AV companies have no say and should do their job and filter the hacked versions, not the legitimate one.Īs for the AV companies, let them stop the patched versions. They are what matters, not other companies. You should listen to your users and base your decisions on their input. You really shouldn't let other companies dictated how you design your product. I'm really disappointed that you are removing a very useful feature. Someone always has an issue with something, even if it's legitimate or the mass likes it. Ultimately, this is your call, but if we removed a feature from an application every time someone has an issue with it, we wouldn't have any applications. Let the AV company do their job and block the proper signatures instead of just blacklisting your app. Especially since MS products have been used as an attack vector since the beginning. If the AV companies banned every application that was hacked, then no Microsoft app would ever pass their tests.

Seems to me that you are just hurting the people that are using it legally, not stopping anything.Īs for the AV companies, let them stop the patched versions. If they are going to use the patched versions, then how is discontinuing the feature going to stop them? They'll just do what I have to do know, use an older version. I understand your concerns, but you already let the cat out of the bag.

Remote utilities viewer remote video surveillance